Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 23:06
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 65
2-Core 130
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 362
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 150
Parallax 140
86% 132 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 133
Splatting 109
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 491
Write 340
Mixed 232
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 3.59
51% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 4.79
14% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
65GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 103
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.27
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
38GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 86.6
74% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.28
97% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 113%
MCT INIC-3906 750GB
343GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 83.6
Write 90.4
Mixed 68.6
104% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.17
55% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback