| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Maximus Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '18 at 21:06 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
52% 82.3 Pts
|
29% 218 Pts
|
14% 221 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.3%
Below average
|
40% 47.5 fps
|
33% 39.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
|
45.1%
Average
|
45% 61.2 MB/s
|
113% 1.01 MB/s
| |
|
|
61%
Good
|
55% 76 MB/s
|
108% 1.06 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
|
25.5%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
52% 76.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Maximus Formula Builds (Compare 52 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 5x |
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 4x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |