Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 00:15
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 287
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 329
Write 358
Mixed 341
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 14.2
103% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 68.1
DQ Mixed 57
40% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
648GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 74
Write 74.8
Mixed 71
94% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 61%
KINGSTON SHSS37A480G 480GB
187GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 235
Write 218
Mixed 214
284% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 8.16
1,378% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 7.85
1,581% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 179%
Great: 216%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
51GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 30.2
Mixed 30.6
40% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.31
52% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback