Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 20:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 273
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,062
96% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3252 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 205
Parallax 210
160% 204 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 199
Splatting 133
126% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
592GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 511
Write 407
Mixed 424
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 29.2
117% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 19.5
50% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 164
Mixed 155
119% 157 MB/s
4K Read 3.97
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.31
238% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 1911 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 38.7
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 22.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback