Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 15:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 797
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 496
Write 193
Mixed 279
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 7.59
106% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 7.74
36% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 72%
WD WD10EARS-22Y5B1 1TB
440GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 51.2
57% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EACS-07D6B1 1TB
73GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 75.9
Write 71.6
Mixed 76.1
56% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.26
78% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 29.9
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 32.1
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback