Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171129
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '18 at 15:24
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 843 78% 649 Pts	64-Core 1,258 78% 1,258 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 188 Parallax 174 138% 177 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 177 Splatting 126 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,550 Write 548 Mixed 827 213% 975 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 22.6 132% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 94.9 DQ Mixed 158 93% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 144%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 112GB free Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4152725 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 57458072498566 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1272 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 654 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 2390 (C2) HDA temperature 34 50 1005025624098 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4152725 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 8 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4152725 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4152725 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15031 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12814 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12814 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20735	43.8% Average	Read 206 Write 146 Mixed 170 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 11.1 86% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 24.7 25% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 126078312 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1837 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 56864740 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5387 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1188 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 25770197000 (BD) vendor-specific 64 64 36 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 689831977 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 29 29 143650 (C2) HDA temperature 41 49 51539607593 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -132602820292838 (F1) Unknown 100 253 96074130081 (F2) Unknown 100 253 76413646177	90.4% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 132 Mixed 122 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.23 60% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 46.2 MC Write 42.7 MC Mixed 37.9 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 34.2 100% 34.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	45x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	32x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	25x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	24x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	12x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x

RAM
Memory 4400 C19 Series 4x8GBPatriotBench 119%, 282 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $764

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16