| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '18 at 21:33 |
| Run Duration | 96 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.4%
Above average
|
52% 80.8 Pts
|
28% 225 Pts
|
16% 257 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
26.5%
Poor
|
26% 34.9 fps
|
27% 32.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
64% 85.2 MB/s
|
68% 0.56 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
52% 76.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |