Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4.75GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.75GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario VT630AA-ABM SR5810LA (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA3
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4.75 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081009
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '18 at 15:09
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon LE-1660 177 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 40.2 34% 46.9 Pts	4-Core 40.3 8-Core 37.2 5% 38.8 Pts	64-Core 40.9 2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 2A6C) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.83 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$60 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 58 Write 5.32 Mixed 10.1 18% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.08 20% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 512, 256, 2048 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.53% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.53% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16