Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E-10G WS  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '18 at 02:36
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 807
71% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 46% Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 496
Mixed 312
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 34.9
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 110
122% 206 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$181
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 191
Mixed 156
136% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 5.24
4K Mixed 0.58
203% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$181
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 196
Mixed 153
138% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 5.24
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 249
Mixed 70.7
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 4.24
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.4
274% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 127%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 50.3
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 133%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback