Acer Aspire X3450

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3450  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3450
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '18 at 09:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 90.7
44% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 174
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 9.03
6% 8.39 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 8.39
6% 7.36 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 60GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 423
Write 66.3
Mixed 110
43% 200 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 8.34
54% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 28.5
36% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
930GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Read 107
Write 109
Mixed 107
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.44
115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G ACR512X64D3U16C11G 9905402-506.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3450 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback