Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '18 at 01:50
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 659
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 775
48% 775 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
Asus(1043 0442) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.921.5.0
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 55.7
31% 41.4 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 36.5
30% 35.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,315
Write 1,437
Mixed 1,289
302% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 59.6
248% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 206
220% 367 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 235%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AP38G1608U2K 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 36.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback