Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	36.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150528
Uptime	8.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 22:55
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 79 2-Core 162 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 634 57% 480 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 6.92 Parallax 8.06 5% 7.15 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 7.13 5% 6.34 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-G256M6eA 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 694 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 119 (B1) Unknown 100 100 20487 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 128732 (F2) Unknown 100 100 95050
Poor: 96% Great: 112%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 75GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28913 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 370 (B1) Unknown 89 89 376 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62396977525	87.1% Excellent	Read 508 Write 489 Mixed 499 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 21.9 84% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 74.3 105% 194 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 116%
SiImage 120GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 56GB free Firmware: 0000 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.3% Poor	Read 147 Write 42.1 Mixed 76.2 19% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.56 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 4.69 38% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 37 DQ Mixed 24.6 30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 65%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$97 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 607GB free Firmware: RR07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 181 3250 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 761 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4593 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (10) Unknown 0 200 3836025876 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1338 (C2) HDA temperature 110 106 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	116% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 239 Mixed 146 136% 182 MB/s	4K Read 6.91 4K Write 3.06 4K Mixed 0.53 403% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 108%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB 493 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1TB free, PID 6014 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 36.3 Write 38.9 Mixed 37.6 49% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 22%
IMATION RDX-USB3 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 379GB free, PID 1102 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.1% Poor	Read 37 Write 36.4 Mixed 27.7 42% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 5.08 4K Mixed 0.45 191% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 37.1 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17.7 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 70%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	40x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	8x
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $246Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 108%, 24 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369