Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2550K-$119
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 233
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 459
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 158
Parallax 136
127% 150 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 147
Splatting 111
103% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS256GCSP 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TA5ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 485
Write 273
Mixed 360
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 24.6
128% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 94
114% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
110GB free
Firmware: SD23 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 77.3
Write 75.8
Mixed 54
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.27
64% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 0616 DDR3-2666 CL11 4GB KHX1866C9D3/4GX 0616 DDR3-2666 CL11 4GB 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback