Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$239
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 42
1-Core 129
2-Core 248
71% 140 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 709
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$770
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 277
Parallax 295
239% 289 fps
MRender 394
Gravity 264
Splatting 190
221% 283 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 207%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1605
Write 1,292
Mixed 1,157
300% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.8
220% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 404
405% 657 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX16GC3000C16W4D 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 26.9" 1280 720 AUS272A ROG XG27UQ
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 76%
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 63%

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback