Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 232
2-Core 462
131% 257 Pts
4-Core 864
8-Core 1,728
153% 1296 Pts
64-Core 3,458
214% 3,458 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1731) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 11.7
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3500_MTFDKBA1T0TGD-1BK15ABYY 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,725
Write 4,811
Mixed 2,751
911% 4,095 MB/s
4K Read 86.8
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 131
451% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 1567
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,308
987% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 547% Great: 598%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
153GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 596
Mixed 464
117% 522 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 139
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR56S46BS8HA-16KM 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 72.3
MC Write 59.5
MC Mixed 63.3
186% 65 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 29.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 165%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 240 16" 1707 1067 CMN162F
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback