Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 984
102% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.20.10
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.4% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 196
Parallax 198
97% 171 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 136
Splatting 89.7
90% 112 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,671
Write 2,520
Mixed 220
327% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 3.8
44% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 298
231% 313 MB/s
Poor: 117% Great: 417%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
497GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 162
Mixed 32.7
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
75GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.1
Write 84.4
Mixed 72.3
104% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4
248% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP16G4DFRA32A.M8FF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30.4
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B4 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop 79%
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback