HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 592
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 115
Parallax 103
84% 107 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 101
Splatting 102
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZ 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 1448 1084 79 183 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 1280
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 702
241% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 68.9
229% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 554
381% 470 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 179%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3000C16-8GISB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24.1" 1280 720 FUS0812 B24W-6 LED
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback