Asrock B650M PG Lightning

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M PG Lightning
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:03
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 188
2-Core 374
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,013
112% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,225
76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
XFX(1EAE 6502) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 141
Parallax 243
94% 166 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 118
Splatting 163
135% 167 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T500SSD8 1TB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8CR002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,324
Write 4716
Mixed 911
734% 3,317 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 27.8
114% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 1,454
960% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 220% Great: 658%
347GB free, PID a301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 20
116% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
148% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 51.7
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 51.6
SC Write 51.5
SC Mixed 45.3
141% 49.5 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 148%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 8G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 21% 56 165 1 144 31.5" 3072 1657 GBT2800 M28U
History: Score 22: 0P 1R 3G 8B | Score 56: 0P 5R 8G 7B
Typical B650M PG Lightning Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop 103%
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asrock B650M PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback