Performance Results

Gaming 352%
Desktop 117%
Workstation 426%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics310% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$366
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 203
2-Core 408
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1676
147% 1,251 Pts
64-Core 2,909
180% 2,909 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5301) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Lighting 431
Reflection 508
Parallax 883
351% 607 fps
MRender 580
Gravity 329
Splatting 488
381% 466 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 310%
Great: 294%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
995GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 2624 2048 2067 2042 1721 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 3,169
Mixed 2,577
SusWrite 1,973
548% 2,413 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 66.5
214% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,917
DQ Write 1,675
DQ Mixed 1,666
1,284% 1,753 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 344%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3036G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4896 MHz clocked @ 5508 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
178% Outstanding
MC Read 73.6
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 62.7
188% 65.9 GB/s
SC Read 49.3
SC Write 60.3
SC Mixed 54
156% 54.5 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 161%
This bench: 178%
Great: 310%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 5R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 26% 31 183 9 165 27" 1280 720 AUS27E0 ASUS VG27W
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 414%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 422%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback