Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 124
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 280
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 18.9
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.9
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 394 400 409 131 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 389
Write 404
Mixed 352
SusWrite 288
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 32.6
118% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 175
146% 210 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
819GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 74
Write 71.8
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 71.7
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 166 10 60 23.8" 1920 1080 HPN36EB HP E24u G4
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 23%
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 19%

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback