Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 C7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-158N  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 339
100% 192 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,072
105% 858 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
MSI(1462 13DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 71.1
32% 52.5 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 25.7
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-AI 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,400
Write 2,971
Mixed 2,100
489% 2,157 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 78.8
263% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 862
641% 867 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 38.5
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 26.2
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 116%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-158N Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 79%

Motherboard: MSI MS-158N

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback