Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:20
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 751
80% 638 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 130
Parallax 120
92% 121 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 124
Splatting 111
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 580 481 166 270 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,608
Write 1,469
Mixed 735
SusWrite 329
230% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 31.9
144% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 641
573% 857 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 170%
Great: 248%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 440 439 445 447 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 462
Mixed 382
SusWrite 442
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 156
173% 293 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
374GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 133 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 181
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 132
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 119 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 120
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
463GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 184 183 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 128
Write 93.4
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 182
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 32.2
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 AUS270E VG279QR
Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 12,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback