Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Gaming 80%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B360M-K
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 606
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Asus(1043 870D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 108
Parallax 135
98% 121 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 108
Splatting 100
101% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 575 98 205 140 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,178
Write 1,172
Mixed 867
SusWrite 204
191% 855 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 49
165% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 266
315% 542 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 141%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 23.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 11% 46 175 7 240 24.5" 1920 1017 ACR06D4 XF252Q X
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 76%
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 63%

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback