Lenovo 83FD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83FD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 08:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 208
2-Core 416
119% 233 Pts
4-Core 787
8-Core 1,322
128% 1,055 Pts
64-Core 2,770
172% 2,770 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 111%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3E43) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.6
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
592GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,728
Write 3,232
Mixed 2,959
805% 3,639 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 116
399% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,535
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,294
967% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 65.6
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 51.7
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 26.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 138%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 19 240 16" 1707 1067 BOE0C1D
Typical 83FD Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback