Huawei KPL-W0X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHuawei KPL-W0X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI KPL-W0X-PCB
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190226
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 22:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 46
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 150
50% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 333
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: Q3 2018
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 16.8
10% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.4
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C286402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 237 249 255 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 362
Write 246
Mixed 221
SusWrite 248
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 16.6
56% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 112
100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTA4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 109 53 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE083C
Typical KPL-W0X Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei KPL-W0X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback