Asus H97-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 21:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$58
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 320
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 67.3
35% 56.4 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 43
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 347 354 357 351 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 446
Mixed 409
SusWrite 356
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 49.8
163% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
244GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 151 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 150
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 159 161 181 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 143
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 171
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical H97-PRO Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback