Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 11:29
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 524
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1231 1360 1340 1182 1570 649 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 813
Mixed 1,079
SusWrite 1,222
240% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 36
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 562
418% 554 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 177%
Great: 354%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
609GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 111 112 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 111
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 5.3
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD056D
Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback