Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8574
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '24 at 07:02
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	ETH-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 110 54% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 316 31% 254 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.85 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	49% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 60 Parallax 60 49% 60 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 60 Splatting 60 49% 60 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA18.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 202 213 137 154 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 239 Write 102 Mixed 308 SusWrite 182 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 22 68% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 192 165% 243 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 100%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 5GB free Firmware: EXA73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,226 Write 1,580 Mixed 1,089 291% 1,298 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 41.5 130% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 527 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 292 253% 379 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G HP26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.3% Good	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 21 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 10.4 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	33	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD05C0

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,176x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	945x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	461x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	339x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	274x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples	194x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	685x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	226x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	175x