Acer Nitro AN515-46

Performance Results

Gaming 103%
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 105%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-46  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Jimny_RBH
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 05:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 310
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1092
101% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 159E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 134
Parallax 134
115% 136 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 107
Splatting 90.8
91% 115 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2276 2630 2637 1568 1635 1632 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,616
Write 3,060
Mixed 2,810
SusWrite 2,063
596% 2,637 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 82.7
266% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 879
648% 860 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 352%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 38.4
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 116%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 165 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0ABF
Typical Nitro AN515-46 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro AN515-46

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback