Biostar Z370GT6

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar Z370GT6 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 269 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 853 83% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,114 69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 111 Parallax 93.4 83% 102 fps	MRender 93 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 94.8 77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0624AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 259 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 245 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 43 (A3) Unknown 100 100 550 (A4) Unknown 100 100 11073 (A5) Unknown 100 100 46 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 8 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 38620918513690 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 97430 (F2) Unknown 100 100 57239 (F5) Unknown 100 100 130799	66.5% Good	Read 481 Write 239 Mixed 258 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 24.7 100% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 62.5 DQ Mixed 14.6 20% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 95%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 111GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28585 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 913 (B1) Unknown 75 75 293 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 94 94 5275 (EB) Unknown 99 99 326 (F1) Unknown 99 99 65091571135	85.1% Excellent	Read 491 Write 336 Mixed 332 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 20 135% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 45.4 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 62.8 70% 112 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2258 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 27 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 69 521469980 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 59 (C2) HDA temperature 115 112 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	97.7% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 176 130% 172 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 2.74 4K Mixed 0.36 142% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB 2,352 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 25.5 84% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370GT6 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 95%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar Z370GT6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	23x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	18x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x

SSD
P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $120Bench 387%, 17,197 samples	6x
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TBBench 407%, 4,117 samples	5x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	5x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GBCorsair $560Bench 84%, 34,441 samples	3x
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 42%, 753 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16