Pcspecialist PULSAR PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist PULSAR PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 13:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$374
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 227
2-Core 2.4
74% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 851
8-Core 1,421
138% 1,136 Pts
64-Core 3381
209% 3381 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$769
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
236% Outstanding
Lighting 342
Reflection 351
Parallax 371
279% 355 fps
MRender 458
Gravity 299
Splatting 213
252% 323 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 236%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$299
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,004
Write 2,555
Mixed 2134
501% 2,231 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 71.6
294% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,938
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,585
1,196% 1,617 MB/s
Poor: 306% Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH5X16G1B56C40A2 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 65.2
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 61.6
177% 61.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 154%
This bench: 157%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 4R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 18% 65 493 353 240 27" 1920 1009 SAM727A Odyssey G40B
Typical PULSAR PRO Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 236%
Desktop 106%
Workstation 236%

System: Pcspecialist PULSAR PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback