HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 73%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201109
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 12:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 984
92% 766 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.34
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 97.3
Parallax 88.6
78% 93.9 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 76.8
71% 88.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 141 151 10 130 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 1286
Write 794
Mixed 814
SusWrite 76.5
164% 743 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 20.1
99% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 23.3
55% 124 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 203%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
127GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 88 90 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 111
Write 95
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 87.8
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23" 1280 720 ENC2350 CS230
Typical ENVY TE01-0xxx Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback