Lenovo F0HQ002DFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0HQ002DFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3783
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '24 at 17:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 333
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,246
113% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 680M
Legend(17AA 3783) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.84.02
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.1% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 56.2
25% 40.7 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 18.7
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1201 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73112101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 746 871 1745 1752 1732 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,574
Write 1,982
Mixed 1,772
SusWrite 1,274
425% 1,900 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 48.3
166% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 754
526% 678 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 260%
Great: 447%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 22.4
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 100 27" 1280 720 LENE418 LEN-A390-A-A
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback