Lenovo 10FVS15300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FVS15300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BE
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 09:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 99
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 261
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 36.9
25% 36 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 23.3
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 106 63 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 399
Write 276
Mixed 272
SusWrite 88.3
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 4.8
49% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 34.5
55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
299GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 120 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 192
Write 177
Mixed 79
SusWrite 120
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
278GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 75 75 74 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 77
Write 51.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 74
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB Kingston KHX2666C13/8GX 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 12 60 23.1" 1920 1017 GSM587B IPS225
Typical 10FVS15300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10FVS15300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback