MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 09:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 693
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 75.4
68% 79.8 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 64.9
64% 80.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 402 180 134 147 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 495
Write 415
Mixed 420
SusWrite 229
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 42.4
143% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 186
144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 123%
T-force 250GB 250GB
11GB free
Firmware: S0430A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 358
Mixed 341
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 45.4
148% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 140
126% 193 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 123%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
953GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 122 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 133
Write 114
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 121
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 34.5
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 28.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback