Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 04:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 554
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.9
76% 97.7 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 92.5
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 429 413 419 433 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 378
Mixed 373
SusWrite 419
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 44.2
145% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 232
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 17% 48 215 58 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2715 27G15
Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback