Performance Results

Gaming 175%
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 201%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 22:05
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 167
82% 134 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 1,075
89% 775 Pts
64-Core 2,017
125% 2,017 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 184
Parallax 519
203% 317 fps
MRender 376
Gravity 220
Splatting 353
261% 316 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 198%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 569 503 641 654 662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1,089
Mixed 1007
SusWrite 585
214% 955 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 20.9
71% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 600
459% 625 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 131%
Great: 372%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
183GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 260 240 303 308 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 387
Write 351
Mixed 277
SusWrite 269
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 12.4
47% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 213
163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 40.9
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback