Asus PRIME A520M-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A II  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 19:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 171
2-Core 345
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,164
112% 924 Pts
64-Core 1382
86% 1382 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 119
Parallax 159
138% 149 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
118% 151 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte G325E1TB 1TB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 558
Write 446
Mixed 479
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 32.5
125% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 532
415% 577 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.3
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0F56 C27JG5x
Typical PRIME A520M-A II Builds (Compare 503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback