HP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 899C
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 14:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 227
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 452
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX550
HP(103C 899C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4626
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 44.3
34% 39 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 35.3
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 428 397 421 423 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,810
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,123
SusWrite 494
252% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 65.9
221% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 359
273% 379 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 189%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO439D
Typical 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback