Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 03:48
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 697
71% 574 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 121
Parallax 106
88% 112 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 90.9
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 2032 2368 2424 2419 2417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 2,470
Mixed 2,202
SusWrite 2,099
525% 2,333 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.3
250% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1113
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1,019
758% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 352%
Great: 623%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 454 456 459 377 356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 398
SusWrite 425
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 57.5
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 188 187 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 191
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 187
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 201 201 202 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 192
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 201
110% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 26.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 29
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 2560 1377 SAM71E1 LS27AG55x
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $587
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback