Dell XPS 14 9440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 14 9440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K5P83
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 01:27
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 55
1-Core 172
2-Core 368
99% 199 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1213
112% 936 Pts
64-Core 1,873
116% 1,873 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Dell(1028 0C6B) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5234
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 48.9
20% 34.1 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 46.4
31% 36.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 3500 Micron 2048GB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 35000100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,020
Write 2,323
Mixed 2,019
544% 2,454 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 76.2
248% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 697
496% 646 MB/s
Poor: 181% Great: 622%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
166% Outstanding
MC Read 68.5
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 75.7
191% 66.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 31.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 166%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 22% 45 56 10 120 0" 1280 720 SDC41A2
Typical XPS 14 9440 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 14 9440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback