Biostar A320MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 17:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 740
74% 601 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX Vega
Gigabyte(1458 2308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1712 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 117
Parallax 192
100% 144 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 146
Splatting 80.4
86% 108 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 448 452 454 455 302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 458
Mixed 440
SusWrite 426
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 47.5
157% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 275
229% 330 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 97 96 96 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 91
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 95.7
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 27
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 MSI8CB5 MSI G2712
Typical A320MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback