Acer Nitro AN16-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN16-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Sierra_PEH
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 07:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 225
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 646
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 660M
Acer(1025 1679) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 30.8
14% 24.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 21.2
15% 17.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 1071 1051 1334 1355 1384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1,021
Mixed 1,208
SusWrite 1211
278% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 43
139% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 595
413% 529 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 200%
Great: 443%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26.2
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B72
Typical Nitro AN16-41 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Nitro AN16-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback