Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E24
MotherboardMSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 02:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 190
2-Core 378
115% 218 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,044
112% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,335
83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Asus(1043 05FD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 272
Parallax 522
211% 351 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 285
Splatting 265
237% 293 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,000
Write 4,030
Mixed 3,046
823% 3,692 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 71
231% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,657
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,505
1,071% 1,381 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 534%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5EU016G-6400LA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 70
MC Mixed 68.9
190% 66.5 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 69.5
SC Mixed 57.2
169% 59.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 182%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24) Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 145%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 147%

Motherboard: MSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback