Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 02:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 904
87% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$732
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
246% Outstanding
Lighting 358
Reflection 346
Parallax 372
291% 358 fps
MRender 492
Gravity 302
Splatting 218
262% 337 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 246%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 63 1313 1373 1355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 3,205
Write 24.7
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 693
210% 990 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 5.6
98% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 27
DQ Mixed 47.8
114% 259 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 213%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 34.8
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1280 720 ACR080F XZ270U P
Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback