Daten ESTELAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDaten ESTELAR  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten GM5AG0O
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220621
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 60.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 207
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 508
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1174) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 19
Parallax 19.5
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 9.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-512GC1 512GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1310 1338 1373 1091 267 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1976
Write 1,394
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 938
305% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 49.2
188% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 787
569% 734 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 225%
Great: 291%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 560 534 529 534 526 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,425
Write 1,386
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 643
260% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 55.6
216% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 810
598% 796 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 197%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548S38-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 42.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 131 53 165 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0974
Typical ESTELAR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Daten ESTELAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback