Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 15:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 125
53% 88 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 203
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 37.1
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.4
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 129 151 149 170 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 149
Write 179
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 147
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 60 27" 1280 720 SAM731F S27C36x
Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 47%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback