Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230308
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 14:44
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 204
2-Core 413
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 829
8-Core 1,660
147% 1,244 Pts
64-Core 2,964
183% 2,964 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2765 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 257
Parallax 163
136% 196 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1889 2208 2224 2130 1689 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2,806
Write 2,490
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 1,702
485% 2,164 MB/s
4K Read 84.8
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 121
414% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 1,370
DQ Mixed 748
705% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 401%
Great: 435%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
374GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 313 389 259 238 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 478
Mixed 389
SusWrite 315
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49.8
174% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 195
185% 291 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 297 297 296 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 474
Mixed 413
SusWrite 315
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 58.9
204% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
678GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 447 447 447 463 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 451
Mixed 441
SusWrite 454
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47
154% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 111%
Great: 132%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
290GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 137 104 109 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1406
Write 1,432
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 220
229% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 84.1
301% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 272
342% 598 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 197%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 81.2
MC Write 78.9
MC Mixed 75.9
225% 78.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 36.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 199%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 170 27" 1280 720 MSI3CD3 MSI G272QPF
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 3,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback