MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 days ago, 13 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 13:40
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 837
76% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Sapphire(1DA2 439E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
175% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 244
Parallax 418
169% 290 fps
MRender 394
Gravity 167
Splatting 319
241% 294 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 175%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1616 1617 1503 1364 1064 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,631
Write 2,469
Mixed 1,972
SusWrite 1,493
480% 2,141 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 91.9
308% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1156
868% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 344%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
67GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 313 312 313 307 279 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 493
Mixed 466
SusWrite 324
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65
220% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
141GB free
Firmware: JA0OA480
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 75.1
Write 72.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 65.1
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 57%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
185GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 111 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 74
SusWrite 110
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 35.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 5R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 36% 45 209 58 144 23.8" 1920 1080 VSC0D39 XG2405
History: Score 54: 0P 5R 9G 2B | Score 42: 0P 5R 5G 2B
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback