Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 13:40
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 194
2-Core 385
117% 222 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1,198
115% 950 Pts
64-Core 1,600
99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Gigabyte(1458 40E4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 529
Reflection 520
Parallax 664
431% 571 fps
Gravity 534
Splatting 272
338% 403 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,028
Write 1,710
Mixed 1,208
297% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 65.8
253% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 1,285
DQ Mixed 1,249
924% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 307%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1756 1826 1755 1374 1189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,376
Mixed 1,804
SusWrite 1,653
463% 2,059 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 81.8
280% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,778
DQ Write 1,491
DQ Mixed 1,576
1,197% 1,615 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 356%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 57.7
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 46.9
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 46.9
137% 48.1 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 161%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 4R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 50% 38 211 49 240 27" 2560 1440 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $2,230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback